<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>interjunction.org &#187; kranz</title>
	<atom:link href="http://interjunction.org/tag/kranz/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://interjunction.org</link>
	<description>media meets academia: site on media-related issues: journalism, media ethics, history and responsibilities, media effects and globalisation, and journalism education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 19:43:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>And papa can&#8217;t do a thing</title>
		<link>http://interjunction.org/pointer/media-buzz-march-20-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://interjunction.org/pointer/media-buzz-march-20-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chindu Sreedharan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pointer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gossip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kranz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narisetti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war reportage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://interjunction.org/pointer/buzz-from-the-web-march-20-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In which British kids <a href=http://interjunction.org/pointer/buzz-from-the-web-march-20-2008#kids>thumb their noses online</a>, ITV lads <a href=http://interjunction.org/pointer/buzz-from-the-web-march-20-2008#jolly>go to war</a>, scribes look at <a href=http://interjunction.org/pointer/buzz-from-the-web-march-20-2008#pontius>five years of Iraq</a>, <em>Mint</em>'s Raju Narisetti <a href=http://interjunction.org/pointer/buzz-from-the-web-march-20-2008#mint>takes on</a> <em>NYT</em>'s Patty Kranz, the Vicar of Putney <a href=http://interjunction.org/pointer/buzz-from-the-web-march-20-2008#pontius>prays</a> for Bush's soul... <strong>Buzz from the web</strong>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>In which </em><a href="#jolly"><em>ITV lads go to war</em></a><em>, scribes</em> <em>look at </em><a href="#pontius"><em>five years of Iraq</em></a>, Mint<em> </em><a href="#mint"><em>takes on</em></a> NYT,<em> the</em> <em>Vicar of Putney </em><a href="#pontius"><em>prays for </em></a><em>Bush&#8217;s soul, and British kids <a href="#kids">thumb their noses online</a>&#8230; Buzz from the web.</em></p>
<p><br clear="all" /><a name="kids" title="kids"></a>WHAT DO BRITISH kids do when they are bored?</p>
<p>They socialise. Online.</p>
<p>So what do they do when they are <em>not</em> bored? </p>
<p>They socialise. Online.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the dope: an Institute for Public Policy Research study &#8212; to be published next month but sneak-viewed by Guardian Communications Editor <strong>Richard Wray</strong> &#8212; shows children this side of the Atlantic <a target="_blank" href="http://interjunction.org/wp-admin/Warning%20to%20parents%20over%20children%20'being%20raised%20online'">spend more than 20 hours a week on social networking sites</a> such as <a target="_blank" href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.myspace.com">MySpace</a> and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bebo.com">Bebo</a>.</p>
<p>So kids are in effect &#8220;raised online&#8221;, whatever that means.</p>
<p>Of course the kids know parents don&#8217;t like them partying out there, but, hey, how&#8217;re they going to stop &#8216;em?</p>
<p>Like one smarty pointed out &#8211; and this <em>is</em> interesting &#8212; parents and teachers know diddly-squat about the net and there are a zillion ways around the child locks and other tricks they try:</p>
<p>&#8220;We have restrictions at school but we can just get an administrator&#8217;s account and take them off.&#8221;</p>
<p>Parents these days, we tell you.</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: 14pt"><span style="font-size: 12pt"><span style="font-size: 14pt"><br />
Gotcha! No, you didn&#8217;t! </span></span></span></strong></p>
<p><a name="mint" title="mint"></a>So we had the <em>NYT-Mint</em> spat, which, by the look of it, <em>Mint</em> won, no sweat.</p>
<p>For the uninitiated, it began with <em><a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/">NYT&#8217;s</a></em> Sunday Business Deputy Editor <strong>Patricia Kranz</strong> <a target="_blank" href="http://poynter.org/forum/view_post.asp?id=13191" title="Katz's complaint to Poynter">complaining to Poynter</a> about a &#8216;discovery&#8217; she and friends made.</p>
<p>Apparently, there is this website called <a target="_blank" href="http://www.livemint.com/Lounge.aspx">livemint.com</a> (online avatar of the Indian newspaper <em>Mint,</em> as she, um, discovered soon enough) happily lifting &#8220;numerous&#8221; stories from the <em>NYT</em> and <em>International Herald Tribune &#8212; </em>wasn&#8217;t that shameful and such a &#8220;flagrant case of mass copyright infringement&#8221;?</p>
<p>Would&#8217;ve been, but seems <strong>Kranz</strong> got it all wrong.</p>
<p>In his <a target="_blank" href="http://poynter.org/forum/view_post.asp?id=13197">rebuttal</a>, <em>Mint</em> Managing Editor <strong>Raju Narisetti </strong>said HT Media, <em>Mint&#8217;s</em> parent, has a syndication agreeement with the <em>NYT</em> and could <strong>Kranz</strong> please check her facts before she spake?</p>
<p>For good measure, <strong>Narisetti</strong>, who took media ethics &#8220;very seriously&#8221;, also got HT Media lawman <strong>Dinesh Mittal</strong> to issue a notice to <em>NYT</em> demanding it withdraw its allegations and update records.</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t heard from <strong>Kranz</strong> since, but are the folks at <em>NYT</em> making an awful lot of mistakes these days?</p>
<p>Shh, let&#8217;s not talk about the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/16/opinion/16pubed.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">February embarrasment</a>&#8230;</p>
<p><a name="jolly" title="jolly"></a><strong><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br />
<span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: times new roman,times">The jolly war in Afghanistan</span></span></strong></p>
<p>Seems there&#8217;s a good laugh on in Afghanistan &#8211; if you were to believe <a target="_blank" href="http://blip.tv/file/723811">this ITV video blog</a>.</p>
<p>But war is no fun &#8211; if you go by this well-made <a href="http://s11.video.blip.tv/1810002614189/Zoesmith-BehindTheScenesInAfghanistan892.wmv">multimedia package</a> from Reuters.</p>
<p><strong>Paul Bradshaw&#8217;s </strong>critique of the two, <a target="_blank" href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2008/03/19/war-reporting-two-online-reports-spot-the-difference/#more-1039">War reporting: two online reports &#8212; spot the difference</a>, is certainly worth a read. As he says, one&#8217;s a blog, another journalism &#8212; and the difference is quite evident.</p>
<p>One day the ITV lads will grow up. Who knows, they might even spot the difference.</p>
<p><br clear="all" /><a name="pontius" title="pontius"></a><strong><span style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: times new roman,times">For he knows not</span></span></span></strong></p>
<p>Speaking of war and Easter and five years of Iraq, the <strong>Vicar of Putney </strong><strong>&#8211; </strong>no relation to the one in <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/vicarofdibley/" title="Vicar of Dibley">Dibley</a>, mind &#8211; has an interesting commentary in the <em>Guardian</em>, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/mar/22/religion.usa">A funny kind of Christian</a>.</p>
<p>In a nutshell, it is about <strong>Bush the Evangelist</strong> &#8212; and why he will not go to heaven.</p>
<p>While on the topic, here are a few suggestions &#8212; some quite offbeat &#8212; for your Iraq reading&#8230;</p>
<p>In the CJR series <em>On the Ground</em>, <strong>Paul McLeary</strong> contextualises Iraq and the stories that do not always get reported. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/on_the_ground_1.php?page=1">The Enemy of My Enemy</a> is the first in the series.</p>
<p>Another good resource, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=87942150">the perspectives of scribes who covered the war</a>, from <strong>John F Burns</strong> to <strong>Anne Garrels</strong> to <strong>Ted Koppel</strong>, a kind of reporter&#8217;s notebook on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.npr.org/">NPR</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Juan Cole</strong>, writing in <em>Salon</em>, is critical of Bush in <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/03/19/iraq_five/">Five years of Iraq lies</a> &#8211; and how.</p>
<p><em>Time</em> presents a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.time.com/time/2007/iraq/1.html">timeline of the Iraq</a>, month by month. And <em>Newsweek</em> offers <a target="_blank" href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/123205">a look at the <em>next</em> five years</a>.</p>
<p>The <em>USA Today</em> points to how <a target="_blank" href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/webguide/internetlife/2008-03-15-iraqwaronline_N.htm">the Iraq war has gone online</a>. And in this Reuters analysis, <strong>Andrew Gray</strong> talks about <a target="_blank">the changes Iraq brought about in the US Army</a>.<br />
<strong><span style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif"> </span></strong></p>
<p><a name="collateral" title="collateral"></a><strong><span style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size: 14pt; font-family: times new roman,times">Collateral damage</span></span></span></strong></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a pointer to a forgotten war, also to a collateral damage we don&#8217;t normally take note of &#8212; all credit to South Asian Journalists Association&#8217;s <strong>Sugi</strong> for flagging this up.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s from <strong>Simon Gardner&#8217;s</strong> piece on the Sri Lankan war (yes, there is a war still on that side), <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2008%5C03%5C21%5Cstory_21-3-2008_pg4_17">Elephants fall victim to Sri Lanka war</a>. And here&#8217;s the passage that makes it so extraordinary:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Once he came with a gunshot wound to his stomach. We made a paste of chilli powder, pepper and turmeric and rubbed it on the wound,&#8221; Jayasinghe said. &#8220;Then he used his trunk to massage the paste in!&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://interjunction.org/">Home</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://interjunction.org/pointer/media-buzz-march-20-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://s11.video.blip.tv/1810002614189/Zoesmith-BehindTheScenesInAfghanistan892.wmv" length="29008648" type="video/x-ms-wmv" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

